The Eachine Trashcan and BetaFPV 75 Pro 2 are two leading examples of the fast growing ‘Power-whoop’ FPV racing drone category; micros small enough to fly inside but powerful enough to tackle outdoor obstacles. BetaFPV was first to establish the Power-whoop with the Beta 75X and the 75 Pro 2 is their newer, lighter and more affordable offering. In contrast, the Trashcan is the first Power-whoop from Eachine, but going by the data (below), a big contender for the 75 Pro 2.
Interactive matrix may take a few seconds to load… CLICK matrices for latest prices. Support FPVcompare by becoming a Patreon supporter or making any purchase (not just the linked product) after clicking one of the matrix affiliate links.
Though the Trashcan is almost 20% heavier than the 75 Pro 2, it has higher video transmission power, a more premium camera, more powerful motors and a lower price. So is the 75 Pro 2 beat? Flying the 75 Pro 2 reveals its major advantage – lighter weight. This provides snappy direction changes with minimal throttle input and a 5 minute flight time using 2x BetaFPV 300mAh batteries (or 4.5 minutes on 2x BetaFPV 260mAh batteries). For comparison, the Trashcan barely manages 4 minutes on the 300mAh batteries and 3.5 minutes with the 260mAh batteries. Direction changes also require greater throttle input.
What the Trashcan loses in flight time and inertia, it more than makes up for in power. The 15000kv 0803 motors are stonking, delivering punch to rival larger 5″ quadcopters. The Caddx camera on the Trashcan also delivers richer colour than the generic item on the 75 Pro 2 and less of a fisheye perspective (though not all pilots will prefer this). Both the Trashcan and 75 Pro 2 proved robust, suffering negibible damage despite numerous crashes during 4 weeks of flight (the 75 Pro 2 canopy suffered some scratches).
The two power whoops take different aesthetic approaches; the elegant blue pod of the 75 Pro 2 contrasted against the more functional Trashcan pod (offering camera angle adjustability), with the Trashcan also sporting a Knight Rider style LED at the rear. Our scales find both power whoops close to their stated weights, with the 75 Pro 2 1g heavier than expected (above).Which Power whoop should you choose? If you value flight time above all else, the 75 Pro 2. But in every other way, the Trashcan is the more capable Power whoop, and by some margin. See how the Trashcan and 75 Pro 2 compare to other Power whoops using the comparison matrix below. If you’re new to FPV use the decision flowchart below to get flying.
Interactive CLICK flowchart for product or comparison matrix links. Download printable flowchart HERE. FPV = First person view, PNP = plug and play, which requires you purchase a seperate controller and receiver to plug into the multirotor flight controller then bind, bind & fly quads require you purchase and bind a seperate controller, LiPo = Lithium-polymer, Whoop = 55-75mm size multirotor with a 1S LiPo, Powerwhoop = 75mm whoop with a more powerful 2S LiPo. Cinewhoop = 75mm or above Powerwhoop with HD recording function. Flowcart inspired by Gulzar’s ‘Want to fly quadcopters’ flowchart at FPVfrenzy.